12 Angry Men

Every homo put on trial is considered bleak until be disgraced. In 12 Angry Men this possible action fundament al some be considered false to the jurymans involve in this arrive at case. But one man crapper be ascribe with sticking to the innocent until proven unrighteous theory that most likely saved a mans life. This juror must give tongue to 11 different jurors that he can prove with equal valid raise that this male child is be misusefully charge of executeing his father. Reginald Rose shows us how that one mans integrity can prove to make a big difference in a fools life. Juror #8 can be attribute with saving someones life. Under zealous and hostile scrutiny juror #8 is the only juror to vote not guilty on the stabbing terminal of a boys father. #8 doesnt turn over straight proscribed that this boy is innocent of this crime. #8 trusts that it would wrong to send a boy off to be put to death without discussing it first. Jurors #3 and #10 are the most hostile of the jurors. They believe plentiful down that this boy killed his father. They believe that everything they heard in the courtroom holds true and they dont really want to see this kid move any longer. Juror #8 still had sound interrogative about the murder.

He doesnt want to vote guilty until he has enough evidence that this boy did indeed kill his father. many an(prenominal) different points are made about the boy who supposedly stabbed his father, that are cross examined well by juror #8 who still stands alone at not guilty. each of the evidence that the 11 jurors found contains flaws in them. For instance the cleaning lady who supposedly witnessed the stabbing wasnt we aring her glasses. Also the stab chew up i! n the boys father was made so that a... If you want to embody a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay